Chudinov Ivan Aleksandrovich Gufsin was detained. Gufsin of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region. Press service of the Gufsin for the Sverdlovsk region

https://www.site/2017-07-13/delo_podpolkovnika_sverdlovskogo_gufsin_obvinyaemogo_v_poluchenii_vzyatki_peredano_v_sud

The case of lieutenant colonel of the Sverdlovsk GUFSIN, accused of taking a bribe, was submitted to court

Jaromir Romanov

The criminal case of the head of the department was sent to the Beloyarsky District Court for consideration on the merits logistic support GUFSIN in the Sverdlovsk region, accused of taking a bribe on an especially large scale (part 6 of article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

According to investigators. lieutenant colonel internal service personally and through an intermediary received 3.2 million rubles from commercial companies for assistance in concluding a state contract for the supply of food for penitentiary institutions. “In fact, deals for the supply of low-quality food from two third-party organizations were covered up,” the department states.

Currently, the accused has been removed from his post in the GUFSIN, his property has been arrested: cash, a snowmobile and hunting rifles have been confiscated. The arrest was also imposed on bank accounts. At the same time, the bribe giver avoided criminal prosecution - a procedural decision was made against him to terminate the criminal prosecution in connection with active repentance and assistance in the investigation of the case.

As part of a press tour organized by the head of the department of the organization employment special contingent of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region and his deputy lieutenant colonels of the internal service Ilya Kolomiyts and Natalia Sherstneva, with the assistance of the press service of the GUFSIN, journalists from the regional media visited IK-47 (Kamensk-Uralsky). The event was attended by representatives of five television channels and two news agencies Yekaterinburg.

The inspector of the branch for the Sinarsky district of the city of Kamensk-Uralsky GUFSIN, major of the internal service Svetlana Timershina and the director of the Alternativa social adaptation center Stanislav Uspensky discussed the issues of holding joint events with convicts without isolation from society. This meeting took place within the framework of the cooperation agreement signed in April between the UII branch and the center.

The Sverdlovsk region, among many regions, has joined the All-Russian project "Forest of Victory". Employees of IK-19 (Tavda) of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region, as well as members of their families, took part in an action near the village of Oshmarka, which was organized by the Tavdinsky forestry.

For the children of sponsored kindergarten school No. 12, employees of IK-19 (Tavda) of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region organized an excursion to the security department of the institution.Employees of the security department demonstrated to the children the work of a service dog to detain an intruder, search a vehicle, detect narcotic substances, and also showed a general course of training at the movie theater.

On May 19, in the Krasnoturyinsky colony for convicted women, a meeting was held with specialists from the Comprehensive Center social services of the population of the city of Krasnoturinsk on the topic: “The rights of released convicts to work, household arrangements. Types of social assistance”.

Every year on May 18, International Museum Day is celebrated. On this day, employees of the Penitentiary Inspectorate for the Slobodo-Turinsky District of the Main Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Sverdlovsk Region and employees of the territorial commission for minors and the protection of their rights in the Slobodo-Turinsky District organized a survey visit with minors to the Museum of Local History.

On the territory of IK-53 (Verkhoturye) of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region, at the initiative of the administration of the institution, a decorative fountain was installed, which is a composition on a pedestal of two vases, in the upper there is a sculpture of a girl. The work on the installation of the fountain was carried out with great diligence by the convicts. Thus, IK-53 has its own attraction.

In the Greenwich shopping and entertainment center in Yekaterinburg, an exhibition of works by young Yekaterinburg photographers Stanislav Dunin, Daria Shulakova and Diana Rusakova "In captivity willy-nilly" has opened.

In correctional colony-6 (Nizhny Tagil) of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region, an introductory tour was held for 2nd and 3rd year students of the USUE Institute of Finance and Law as part of the study of legal disciplines " Criminal law”, “Criminal process”, “Criminal and executive law”.

In Nizhny Tagil, the results of the “Square of Warmth” campaign, which was dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the Great Victory, were summed up. Employees of IK-13 took part in the action, knitting 10 squares for a warm blanket for veterans. Employees of IK-6 also congratulated their veterans in an unusual way - they sewed warm blankets and bed linen for all participants in the war.

Name Russian Federation

Beloyarsky District Court of the Sverdlovsk Region, consisting of:

presiding judge Kurbatova N.L.,

with the participation of the public prosecutors of the senior prosecutor of the Department of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation with deployment in Yekaterinburg Antonov A.E., the prosecutor of the department of public prosecutors of the prosecutor's office of the Sverdlovsk region Vdovina O.Yu.,

defendant Chudinova I.A.,

defenders of the defendant lawyers Poddubny V.V., who presented the certificate

And a warrant from, A.N. Makukhi, who presented a certificate and a warrant from,

at the secretary of the court session Pozdeeva N.S.,

having examined in open court a criminal case on charges of

Chudinova I. A.,<...>not previously convicted

in the commission of a crime provided for by Part 6 of Article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation,

INST A N O V&L:

Chudinov I.A., appointed by order of the head of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Sverdlovsk Region - hp<...>GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region, being a person constantly performing organizational, administrative and administrative functions in a state body - a territorial body of the Federal Penitentiary Service, in accordance with job description having the right, inter alia, to take measures to ensure that suppliers fulfill their contractual obligations for the supply of inventory items in established by the agreement deadlines, and in case of default by suppliers of contractual obligations, organize the timely filing of fines, claims and claims for damages, collection of fines, penalties, in the period from to received personally and through intermediaries a bribe in the form of money, on an especially large scale, for inaction and actions, included in his official powers, as well as for contributing to them by virtue of his official position taking actions in favor of the bribe giver and persons represented by him under the following circumstances.

And between the GUFSIN of Russia for the Sverdlovsk Region, acting on behalf of the Russian Federation, in order to ensure state needs and fulfill the state defense order for a year, acting as a state customer, and the Ulyanovsk Federal State Unitary Agricultural Enterprise of the Federal Penitentiary Service, acting as supplier, state contracts were concluded for the supply of goods No. 178-yur and No. 564-yur, according to which the supplier undertakes to transfer to the state customer high-quality and safe food products - gutted frozen chicken meat of the 1st grade GOST R 31962-2013, and the state customer undertakes to provide acceptance and payment of goods. At the same time, these contracts stipulate that the supplier undertakes to transfer the goods in terms of quality and safety that meet the requirements contained in the regulatory, technical documents and in the contract, as well as to carry out a free replacement of goods that do not correspond in quality and safety, subject to storage conditions in accordance with current GOST ohm (TU).

Supplies of poultry meat to the FGUSHP "Ulyanovskoye" of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia under the state contract No. 178-yur were carried out from to, and under the state contract No. 564-yur - from to.

On the territory of the city of Yekaterinburg, a meeting of Chudinov I.A. and individual entrepreneur A., ​​who is the actual<...><...>which, under the supply agreement No. 5 dated, was supposed to supply poultry meat to warehouses LLC "Tagay poultry farm" for its subsequent delivery to the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region, during which Chudinov I.A. there was an intent to receive a bribe in the form of money for inaction and actions included in his official powers, as well as for actions that he could contribute by virtue of his official position, namely for the unhindered acceptance of poultry meat.

Realizing their criminal intent, at the specified time and place Chudinov AND.A. reached with A., who is interested in making a profit by ProfPostavki LLC represented by him, as well as in increasing the volume of products in the form of poultry meat supplied by the specified legal entity to Tagayskaya Poultry Farm LLC, an agreement to transfer it to him in cash and non-cash at the expense of own funds illegal monetary reward at the rate of 5 rubles per 1 kilogram of supplied products - poultry meat, for providing Chudinov AND.A. by virtue of their official powers and official position, acceptance of products in the form of poultry meat supplied by an organization controlled by A., under the guise of products produced by the FGUSKhP "Ulyanovskoye" of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, to the institutions of the Main Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region on the basis of government contracts concluded in 2015.

During this meeting, in the daytime, on a plot of land near the intersection of streets, A. handed over to Chudinov I.A. part of the bribe in the form of money in the amount of 100,000 rubles.

After that, Chudinov AND.A. for the purpose of conspiring criminal activity, turned to his friend D. (before having the surname S.. with a request to provide an opportunity for a third party to make money transfers intended for him, to a bank card opened in the name of D., to which the latter agreed, and he provided A. details her bank card.

In the period from to A. made seven bank transfers from his bank cards Money, which are part of the bribe intended for Chudinov I.A., to a bank card in the name of D., opened at the office of the Sverdlovsk branch of PJSC Sberbank of Russia, located at the address: Yekaterinburg, st. Malysheva, 31 "v", in the total amount of 697,000 rubles: , in the amount of 100,000 rubles each, and in the amount of 99,000 rubles each.

The funds transferred to A. were withdrawn by D. from ATMs and handed over to Chudinov on the territory of Yekaterinburg.

Not later, Chudinov turned to his friend S. with a request to allow a third party to make money transfers intended for him to a bank card opened in the name of S., to which the latter agreed, and he provided A. her bank card details.

In the period from to A. made two transfers of funds from his bank cards in the amount of 99,000 rubles each, which are part of the bribe intended for Chudinov I.A., to bank card S., opened at the office of the Sverdlovsk branch of PJSC Sberbank of Russia located at the address: Yekaterinburg, st. Kuznetsova, d. 2 -,

The funds transferred to A. in the amount of 198,000 rubles were withdrawn by S. from ATMs and transferred to Chudinov in Yekaterinburg.

In addition, in the period from to in the city of Moscow, A. transferred to Chudinov part of the bribe in the form of cash in the amount of 100,000 rubles, in the period from to in the city of Saratov - in the amount of 100,000 rubles.

Between the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region, acting on behalf of the Russian Federation, in order to meet the state needs and fulfill the state defense order for 2016, acting as a state customer, and the Ulyanovsk Federal Penitentiary Service of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, acting as a supplier, in Yekaterinburg a state contract was concluded for the supply of goods No. 97-yur, according to which the supplier undertakes to transfer to the state customer frozen gutted chicken meat of the 1st grade, and the state customer undertakes to ensure acceptance and payment for the goods in accordance with the terms of the contract. At the same time, the specified contract stipulates that the supplier undertakes to transfer the goods in terms of quality and safety that meet the requirements contained in the regulatory, technical documents and in the contract, as well as to carry out a free replacement of goods that do not meet quality and safety, subject to storage conditions in accordance with with the current GOST (TU).

In accordance with the civil law contracts concluded by the Federal State Agricultural Enterprise "Ulyanovskoye" of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in 2016, the production of the above food products, as in 2015, was to be carried out on production facilities and production lines owned by the individual entrepreneur L. and OOO "Tagay poultry farm", and in the future, as products manufactured by FGUSHP "Ulyanovskoye" of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, be supplied to the territorial bodies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia.

<...>OOO "Tagai poultry farm" L., and the person in charge of the activities of the organization for the processing of poultry meat, in the process of implementing contractual relations between the Federal State Agricultural Enterprise "Ulyanovskoye" of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia P. on the one hand, and individual entrepreneur L. and OOO Tagayskaya Poultry Farm, on the other hand, in 2016, due to the lack of chicken meat produced on the production lines of OOO Tagayskaya Poultry Farm, to fulfill in full the obligations assumed by the Federal State Agricultural Enterprise Ulyanovskoye of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for state contracts with the territorial bodies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, a decision was made to purchase part of the volume of food products that was supposed to be produced on the production lines of Tagayskaya Poultry Farm LLC from third-party organizations, after which, under the guise of products manufactured by the FGUSHP Ulyanovskoye Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, to supply to territorial bodies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, including the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region.

On the basis of the agreements reached in 2015 between P. and A. on the supply of poultry meat to the warehouses of Tagayskaya Poultry Farm LLC, which will subsequently be sent to the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region, between the company with limited liability"Neftagrosnab"<...>which was A., and limited liability company "Simros",<...>which P. with which Neftagrosnab LLC assumed obligations to transfer poultry meat to the ownership of Tagai Poultry Farm LLC.

In the period from to A., fulfilling the agreements previously reached with Chudinov on the transfer of a bribe to the latter in the form of money for providing him, by virtue of his official powers and official position, with the acceptance of products in the form of poultry meat supplied by Neftagrosnab LLC under the guise of products produced by FGUSHP " Ulyanovskoe" of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia to the GUFSIN of Russia for the Sverdlovsk Region under the state contract No. 97-yur, made four transfers of funds of 149,000 rubles each from their bank cards, which are part of the bribe intended for Chudinov I.A., to bank card C in the total amount of 596,000 rubles - ,

The funds transferred to A. were withdrawn by S. from ATMs and handed over to Chudinov on the territory of Yekaterinburg.

Not later Chudinov I.A. turned to his friend E. with a request to allow a third party to make money transfers intended for him to a bank card opened in the name of E., to which the latter agreed, and he provided A. with the details of her bank card.

In the period from to A. made ten bank transfers of funds from his bank cards in the total amount of 1,440,000 rubles, in the amount of 149,000 rubles each, which are part of the bribe intended for Chudinov I.A., to E.’s bank card, open in the office of the Sverdlovsk branch of PJSC Sberbank of Russia, located at: -, and in the amount of 99,000 rubles

E. withdrew the funds transferred by A. from ATMs and handed them over to Chudinov on the territory of Yekaterinburg, or they were withdrawn directly by Chudinov from the bank account by receiving cash from ATMs, including part of the funds in the amount of 60,000 rubles transferred, he received at an ATM located at:,.

In the period from August 2015 to and from to Chudinov I.A. committed inaction for the illegal monetary reward received from A. and the following actions included in his official powers, and also contributed by virtue of his official position to the following actions: he did not demand, in accordance with the terms of state contracts, a gratuitous replacement of chicken meat that does not correspond in quality and safety indicators contained in the regulatory and technical documents and in these contracts, that is, was inactive; ensured the most favorable regime for the acceptance and distribution of poultry meat supplied by ProfPostavki LLC and Neftagrosnab LLC under the guise of products manufactured by the Ulyanovskoye Federal Penitentiary Service of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, by contacting the management of the Arkhangelskoye Federal Penitentiary Service of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia with a request for priority unloading of incoming poultry meat, that is, he contributed to these actions by virtue of his official position; by giving instructions to the leadership of the territorial institutions of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region on the prompt arrival Vehicle of these institutions to receive the incoming poultry meat in accordance with the regulations, that is, he performed actions that are part of his official powers.

Thus, in the period from to Chudinov I.A., realizing his criminal intent aimed at receiving a bribe in the form of money for providing him, by virtue of his official powers and official position, with the acceptance of products in the form of poultry meat supplied by represented A. legal entities- ProfPostavki LLC and Neftagrosnab LLC under the guise of products manufactured by the FGUSKhP "Ulyanovskoye" of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, to the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region under state contracts concluded during 2015-2016 between the FGUFSIN of Russia for the Sverdlovsk Region and the FGUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk Region » The Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, received from A. as a bribe money in the amount of 3,231,000 rubles, which he disposed of at his own discretion.

Public prosecutors at the hearing stated that the defendant Chudinov AND.A. reasonably brought to criminal responsibility under part 6 of Article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, his guilt is fully proven by the evidence collected during the preliminary investigation, available in the case file. During the investigation, a pre-trial cooperation agreement was concluded with Chudinov, the terms of which he complied with in full: he gave consistent confessions about the crime he had committed, exposed the perpetrators in this criminal case, reported on witnesses to the crime, on known facts of abuse official powers head of the GUFSIN of Russia for the Sverdlovsk region, confirmed his testimony during confrontations, actively contributed to the disclosure and investigation of the crime.

defendant Chudinov AND.A. at the hearing he stated that he fully admits his guilt, agrees with the charge, repents of his deed. The pre-trial agreement on cooperation was concluded by him voluntarily and with the participation of the defense counsel.

He testified to the court that in 2015, at the suggestion of A., he received money from him at the rate of 5 rubles per 1 kg of products - chicken meat supplied by A. to Tagayskaya Poultry Farm LLC. Subsequently, he voluntarily gave out most of the money received in the form of a bribe to law enforcement officers.

At the request of the prosecutor, the testimony of Chudinov I.A., given during the preliminary investigation, was read out at the hearing. From his testimony, given after the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement with him, confirmed during the confrontation with A., it follows that in 2015-2016 between the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region and FSUE "Ulyanovskoye" three state contracts for the supply of meat chickens of frozen gutted 1st grade to provide food for convicts serving sentences in the institutions of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region. In this regard, during 2015-2016, poultry meat was supplied to the FSUE Arkhangelskoye warehouses located in Yekaterinburg to the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region of the Sverdlovsk region. On the basis of state contracts, employees of the FSUE "Arkhangelskoye" carried out the acceptance of poultry meat. In August 2015, he met with A., during which he personally offered to pay him money in the amount of 5 rubles per 1 kilogram of poultry meat coming from FSUE Ulyanovskoye for its unhindered acceptance. He agreed to this proposal in order to obtain illegal monetary rewards. After that, A. during 2015 - 2016 on bank cards, the details of which he (Chudinov) provided him, transferred funds for him in the amount of 99,000 rubles to 150,000 rubles. The funds were transferred to the bank cards of his acquaintances D.S. and E., who subsequently removed them and transferred cash to him. During 2015-2016, 697,000 rubles were transferred to A.'s card for him, 794,000 rubles to C.'s card, and 1,400,000 rubles to E.'s card. Also during this period, A., as an illegal monetary reward, transferred him 300,000 rubles in cash - 100,000 rubles each in August 2015 in Yekaterinburg, in December 2015 in Moscow, in May - June 2016 in .Saratov. A. transferred to the bank cards of the indicated persons and personally transferred cash for the unhindered acceptance of chicken meat supplied by Ulyanovskoye. For the monetary reward he received, in favor of A., he ensured the rapid acceptance of chicken meat coming from the FSUE Ulyanovskoye by contacting the employees of the FSUE Arkhangelskoye with a request to unload the meat as soon as possible. In the event that there was no possibility of accepting meat and storing it in FSUE Arkhangelskoye, he or his employees, on his instructions, called the management of the GUFSIN institutions with a request to send cars for meat acceptance as soon as possible. Thus, it provided the most favorable regime for the acceptance and distribution of poultry meat coming from the FGUSKhP "Ulyanovskoye". Also, he was more loyal to the shortcomings identified by the officials of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise Arkhangelskoye when accepting chicken meat. At the same time, he could organize the submission of claims to the FGUSHP "Ulyanovskoye" in connection with the identification of product deficiencies, however, he formally reacted to these shortcomings.

After the testimony was read out, the defendant fully confirmed it and asked to trust his testimony given after the conclusion of a pre-trial agreement on cooperation with him.

The court established that Chudinov complied with all the conditions and fulfilled all the obligations stipulated by the pre-trial cooperation agreement concluded with him.

The accusation, with which Chudinov I.A. agreed, is justified, confirmed by the evidence collected in the criminal case.

actions Chudinova AND.A. are subject to qualification under Part 6 of Article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - the receipt by an official personally and through an intermediary of a bribe in the form of money for committing actions and inaction in favor of the bribe giver and the persons represented by him, if these actions and inaction are within official powers official or if, by virtue of his official position, he can contribute to these actions, committed on an especially large scale.

When sentencing in accordance with Article.Article. , the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the court takes into account the nature and degree of public danger of the committed and the circumstances of the crime committed, the presence of mitigating and absence of aggravating circumstances, the personality of the defendant, as well as the impact of the punishment imposed on his correction and on the living conditions of his family.

The defendant committed an intentional crime, which belongs to the category of especially grave, directed against state power and public service interests.

Mitigating circumstances the court recognizes in accordance with paragraphs G,and h.1 Article. of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the presence of the defendant<...>, active contribution to the disclosure and investigation of a crime, the search for property obtained as a result of a crime, expressed in the fact that Chudinov voluntarily gave out most of the money received in the form of a bribe, the provisions of Part 2 of Art. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and in accordance with Part.2 Article. of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - a full admission of guilt, repentance for the deed.

Investigating the identity of the defendant, the court takes into account that Chudinov AND.A. we have not previously been judged, at the place of residence and previous place of work in the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region, from where he is currently dismissed due to length of service, he is characterized positively, during his service he was repeatedly encouraged (volume 17, case files 66, 123-124), has a dependency<...>located in<...>, stable social connections.

Exceptional circumstances that significantly reduce the degree of public danger of the crime committed, in this case, the court has not established, and therefore there are no grounds for applying the provisions of Art. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

The court sees no grounds for changing the category of crime and believes that in order to restore social justice, correct Chudinov AND.A., prevent new crimes, he should be sentenced to imprisonment, using the provisions of Art. of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation conditionally, with the imposition of additional punishment in the form of a fine and deprivation of the right to hold positions in public service in system executive bodies Russian Federation related to the exercise of the functions of a representative of the authorities, taking into account the mercenary orientation of the crime, its social significance, the balance of interests of protecting society from criminal encroachments.

When determining the amount of the fine, the court takes into account the composition of the family of the defendant, his property status, the presence of dependents, property seized by the court to ensure the execution of the sentence.

In accordance with the provisions of the article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, given the personality of the defendant, that a particularly serious crime against state power and the interests of the public service, committed by him using his official position, the court considers it necessary to deprive Chudinov AND.A. special rank"<...>

preventive measure Chudinova AND.A. in the form of a written undertaking not to leave and proper behavior should be left unchanged until the sentence enters into force.

The fate of material evidence is determined by the court in accordance with the provisions of Article 81 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.

Guided by Article.Article. 307-309,317.7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, court

P I G O V O R I L:

I. A. Chudinova was found guilty of committing a crime under part 6 of article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, for which he was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of SEVEN years, with an additional penalty in the form of a fine in the amount of three times the amount of the bribe in the amount of 9,693 000 (nine million six hundred ninety-three thousand) rubles, and deprivation of the right to hold positions in the public service in the system of executive bodies of the Russian Federation, related to the exercise of the functions of a representative of power, for a period of TEN years.

Deprive Chudinov I. A. of the special title "<...>».

In accordance with Art. of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation consider the imposed sentence of deprivation of liberty suspended, with a probationary period of FOUR years.

Oblige Chudinova AND.A. during the period probationary period appear twice a month for registration at a specialized state body that monitors the behavior of a conditionally convicted person, do not change the place of residence and work without notifying the specialized government agency who exercises control over the behavior of a conditionally convicted person, to be at the place of residence from 22:00 to 06:00 of the next day (if this is not related to labor activity).

Credit to Chudinov I.A. during the term of serving the sentence, the time of his detention from to and under house arrest from to.

preventive measure Chudinova AND.A. in the form of a written undertaking not to leave and proper behavior until the verdict enters into force, to be left unchanged.

Evidence:<...>

The verdict can be appealed on appeal to the Sverdlovsk Regional Court through the Beloyarsky District Court within 10 days from the date of its announcement. If an appeal is filed, the convict has the right to petition for his participation in the consideration of the criminal case by the court of appeal. A petition for consideration of a criminal case by a court of appeal with the participation of the convicted person may be filed by him within 10 days from the date of delivery of a copy of the judgment, as well as within the same period from the date of delivery of a copy of the presentation or appeal that affects his interests.

In addition, the convicted person has the right to entrust the implementation of his defense in the court of appeal, when considering his appeal or the presentation of the prosecutor, to the defense counsel chosen by them, or to petition the court for the appointment of a defense counsel or to refuse a defense counsel.

In addition to visiting IK-53 in Verkhoturye (details in the post HE TO. IR-53. Verkhoturye - the spiritual capital of the Urals.), members of the Public Monitoring Commission for the Sverdlovsk Region (I, Vasily Rybakov ribakov and Anton Kudryakov) November 3, 2014 visited IK-54 (Novaya Lyalya).

During the inspection, the living quarters of the detachments and the canteen were visited, since the main purpose of the visit was to monitor nutrition. The results of the visit reflected in his post HE TO. IK 54. New Lyalya. Food. Vasily Rybakov:

General information: as of November 3, 2014, there are 695 people in PKU IK 54.

During the check it was found:
In IK 54 there are 4 nutritional norms.
The minimum nutritional norm is calculated for 374 people, the second nutritional norm (enhanced) is calculated for 64, the third nutritional norm (for PFRS) for 207 people, the 4th nutritional norm for 1 person.
4 people are involved in cooking. Sanitary books are available. – the first colony where medical books were recorded - approx. A.A.
In the course of checking the organization of food, the following were studied: Sampling log, log bookmarks in the boiler, menu layout and actual setting for the table, boiler order.

The following conclusions are made :
1) Boiler order does not match bookmark log. In particular, the bookmark log does not reflect the receipt of products for 34 people.
2) In the "layout menu" in the column "weight of finished" products, the weight is not indicated finished products.
3) The sampling log does not indicate the sampling time.
4) The doctor's signature was not deciphered in the sampling log.
5) The “layout menu” does not indicate the weight of cottage cheese, juice and butter. The absence of weight in the “layout menu” does not make it possible to understand whether the replacement was made correctly.

Photo from the colony.

We checked the presence of markings on the timing of the commissioning of mattresses

A control corner appeared in the dining room, where control dishes (dinner) and control scales are displayed:

Public observer A. Kudryakov took a sample of the finished dish.

It is not the first check of the nutrition of convicts in the colonies of the Sverdlovsk region that reveals the replacement of cereals and pasta with vegetables (I previously talked about such facts in posts IK 54. New Lyalya. The search for the hidden or how members of the PMC were “put on a gruel”, PMC. IK-10. Power monitoring. . Not only does such a replacement narrow the variety of food, it is not provided for by the Order of the Ministry of JusticeRF dated 02.08.05. No. 125 (in terms of pasta). Employees of Ik-54, other colonies, and the head of logistics support of the GUFSIN of the Russian Federation for the Sverdlovsk regionlieutenant colonel of the internal service Ivan Chudinov ( On clothing allowance and food ... Meeting of members of the POC with employees of the GUFSIN RF for SO) referred to the Instructions that came from the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in 2013:

I decided to check the legality of the use and interpretation of these Instructions on the issue of replacing pasta with vegetables with my request to the Prosecutor's Office of the SO. In my opinion, pasta products related to non-perishable foodstuffs can be stored in sufficient quantities both at the base of FSUE “Arkhangelskoye” and in the colonies themselves. The problem may be the cost of this product? But the Order of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation does not consider price issues, but speaks of physical norms ...

My request text:

During the inspection and monitoring of nutrition in the colonies of the Sverdlovsk region, members of the PMC for the Sverdlovsk region revealed numerous facts of replacing pasta with vegetables (http://msalexandr17.livejournal.com/610717.html, http://msalexandr17.livejournal.com/614028. html , http://msalexandr17.livejournal.com/618995.html) . Meals for convicts are carried out on the basis of the Order of the Ministry of Justice of Russia of the Russian Federation dated 02.08.05. No. 125, which provides for the norms for the replacement of food. This Order does not provide for the replacement of pasta with other types of products. In their explanations, the employees of the colonies, the head of the logistics department of the GUFSIN of Russia in the Sverdlovsk region, lieutenant colonel of the internal service I. Chudinov, refer to the admissibility of replacement on the basis of the Directive of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia dated 30.08.2013. ref. 05-29386. These instructions are not normative act, therefore, can they, worsening the situation of convicts in relation to the norms of the Order of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation No. 125, be the basis for the formation of a layout menu and an actual menu in the colonies of the Sverdlovsk region?

Is it acceptable to replace pasta in colonies with other types of products? Based on what laws and regulations? If such legal grounds is not available, then I ask you to take measures of prosecutorial influence on the restoration of the rights of convicts.

The response to this appeal, according to federal law“On the procedure for considering applications from citizens of the Russian Federation” No. 59-FZ of 02.05.2006, please provide by e-mail.

We are waiting for an answer in order to clarify this pasta story ...

P.S. While members of the POC in the Sverdlovsk region are figuring out where the pasta was from the diet of convicts and how justifiably the pasta disappeared, members of the PMC in Moscow have achieved a change in the quality of pasta in Moscow. In Moscow this species products will now be purchased from wheat of more durum varieties (so that they do not lose their appearance during cooking) -