Su 55 construction company
SU-155, once Russia's largest homebuilder, is approaching 30 billion rubles in debt. To pay off, it is necessary to sell part of the property and continue construction. But the sale is delayed, and work at many sites has been stopped
The claims of the authorities near Moscow to the construction site in Dolgoprudny became a "trigger" for a systemic crisis in the company
The total debt of the SU-155 group, its owner Mikhail Balakin, was estimated at 27 billion rubles at the beginning of July, including 22 billion owed to banks - negotiations were underway with them on restructuring loans. At a meeting with journalists, Balakin described the rescue plan as follows: in order to reduce the debt burden, the group will sell assets - house-building plants and other production facilities, it will focus all efforts on completing the construction of facilities, for which there are already obligations to equity holders and the authorities.
But during the summer, the SU-155 was unable to significantly improve its position. “From the structures of SU-155, the company DSK-NN owes us. We filed for bankruptcy SU-155 and DSK-NN (in April 2015 - RBC), but Mikhail Balakin came to me and asked me to withdraw the claims, promised to pay off the debt by the end of the summer, referring to the subsidies he would receive. Summer is over, the problem is not solved. Therefore, we are forced to enforce the collection of our debt from the companies of the SU-155 group, ”Maxim Poletaev, First Deputy Chairman of the Board of Sberbank, told RBC.
The Ministry of the Construction Complex of the Moscow Region, where the main construction projects are concentrated near SU-155, at the end of August excluded the group from the Charter of Developers of the Moscow Region. “There can be no talk of any level of trust in this company,” the deputy chairman told Interfax Government of the Moscow Region Herman Yelyanyushkin.
On Friday, September 4, an initiative group of SU-155 equity holders held a rally on Krasnopresnenskaya Zastava Square, it was attended by about 200 people, said a member of the group Alexander Timonichev. Those gathered, he said,decided to begin preparations for an all-Russian protest action, which is scheduled for tentatively on September 26.“The situation with the SU-155 is catastrophic: the construction of houses throughout the country has been stopped, the resumption is not expected. The hostages of the situation are more than 100 thousand citizens,” the organizing committee of the rally said in a statement.
The representative of SU-155, Fedor Sarokvasha, claims that the group is fulfilling all its obligations. According to him, positive changes in the SU-155 business can be judged in the fourth quarter.
The first mistake is dependence on government orders
Over the past 15 years, SU-155 has built so much housing that it would be possible to resettle a city of one million: based on the federal standard of 18 square meters. m area per person. For ten years in a row, starting from 2004, the group annually leased more than 1 million square meters. m housing and was consideredthe largest residential developer in the country; inIn 2013 and 2014, its annual revenue exceeded 100 billion rubles. (see graphs). Last year, the SU-155 lost the lead for the first time closest competitor - Morton ”, which handed over a little more than 1 million square meters. m.
The main owner of SU-155, Mikhail Balakin, was never able to create a new effective business model for the developer without a government order (Photo: RIA Novosti)
Mikhail Balakin
hereditary builder
Mikhail Balakin is the main owner and chairman of the board of directors of the SU-155 group of companies, since 2014 he has been a deputy of the Moscow City Duma of the sixth convocation. The owner of a personal fortune of $ 1.7 billion (50th place among the richest businessmen in Russia), according to Forbes.
Born in 1961 in Serpukhov near Moscow. He followed in the footsteps of his father, a professional builder, into the industry. In 1983 he graduated from the Moscow Engineering and Construction Institute. Kuibyshev. He began his career in the trust "Mosfundamentstroy-1" of Glavmosstroy, where he got on the distribution. Starting as a foreman, he quickly advanced to the chief engineer.
Co-owner of SU-155
In 1990, Balakin was appointed director Construction Department No. 155 Glavmosstroy. Three years later, during the privatization of state assets, the management was transformed into SU-155 CJSC, Balakin acquired a controlling stake in the enterprise and became its general director.
Now, according to Forbes, he owns 65% of the group. The names of the minority shareholders of SU-155 have never been disclosed, but according to the SPARK database, Balakin's wife, Marina, is among them.
Achievements in the civil service
In 2000, Balakin left the SU-155 and went to work at the Complex for Architecture, Construction, Development and Reconstruction of Moscow. He occupied leadership position, where he approved the schedules and addresses for the construction of objects under the city order, and was also responsible for the reconstruction of dilapidated housing stock. Under him, in particular, the building of the library of Moscow State University, new scene Bolshoi Theatre, the building of the House of Music on the Red Hills, Europe Square near the Kyiv railway station, an artificial ski slope in Novo-Peredelkino.
In 2005, Balakin left this position due to own will and returned to the management of the SU-155, where he works to this day. Over the five years of Balakin's work in the mayor's office, the volume of commissioned housing SU-155 has more than quadrupled.
Useful acquaintances
During the 2008 crisis, the total debt of SU-155, according to Kommersant, was estimated at 30 billion rubles, and the company was the first among developers in terms of the number of bankruptcy claims received. Nevertheless, the state provided her with assistance, and Balakin retained his asset and, moreover, developed his business. For a long time, this was facilitated by ties with Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov - his wife Elena Baturina headed the Inteko company, with which SU-155 worked closely - and Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov.
Under Serdyukov, the SU-155 was the leader in terms of the volume of state orders for the construction of housing for the military. In this, the company was assisted, in particular, by the then head of the department of property relations of the Ministry of Defense and Serdyukov's girlfriend Evgenia Vasilyeva, who, before joining the ministry, led the "daughter" of the SU-155 in St. Petersburg.
Good luck on construction market Balakin owes much to his connections with the former officials of the Moscow construction complex, according to several owners and top managers of development companies interviewed by RBC. In 2000, Balakin came to work in the Moscow mayor's office as the first deputy head of the capital's construction complex, Vladimir Resin, he supervised the construction of municipal facilities and the reconstruction of dilapidated housing stock. It is Resin that RBC interlocutors consider the main patron of the SU-155 in the first half of the 2000s. Resin , who is now a member of the State Duma, declined to answer questions for this article.
During the years spent by Balakin in the civil service, his SU-155 more than doubled the annual volume construction - with less than 500 thousand sq. sq. m in 2000 to 1.3 million in 2005. Non-conflicting by nature, Balakin nevertheless made enemies in the mayor's office, says one of RBC's interlocutors: his main opponent was the then head of the department investment projects Leonid Krasnyansky. In an interview with Vedomosti in 2005, Balakin explained his resignation by saying that things in the company were not going very well without his prompt intervention.
Group SU-155, including dozens industrial enterprises, in the 2000s was the only company in Russia capable of building 1 million square meters annually. m of housing, claims Interlocutor of RBC, close to the head of a large Moscow region developer who worked with Balakin. In 2005, Balakin said that in fact the SU-155 at 15 of its enterprisesproduces everything that is necessary for the construction of housing -bricks, cement, reinforced concrete and wooden crafts, tower and automobile cranes, elevators.Part of enterprisesgot into the group in the process of corporatization in 1993, part was acquired later.Now, out of more than 80 industrial enterprises and construction organizations that are part of the SU-155 group, more than a third are house-building factories, machine-building enterprises, etc., including such large ones as the Domodedovo plant of reinforced concrete products and the Shcherbinsky elevator-building plant.
But before the presence of such huge production capacities and human resources(right now inSU-155 employs about 20 thousand people, and a few years ago it was twice as many) justified itself, Sarokvasha explains: “In many tenders for the construction of housing for military personnel, the SU-155 was sole member, because other players were not ready to build housing according to the announced Ministry of Defense prices. Accordingly, the SU-155 won many competitions.” Before the crisis of 2008, the share of government orders in the SU-155 portfolio fluctuated at the level of 50%, then it increased to 70%.
Working primarily on government orders was Balakin's first mistake, two developers familiar with the situation at the company explain. At the end of 2012, Sergei Shoigu, having become the Minister of Defense, proposed to abandon government orders for housing construction and switch to a subsidy scheme. In particular, due to the new policy of the ministry, the share of state orders in the SU-155 portfolio began to rapidly decline: by the end of 2015, it will be about 25%, the company said.
The second mistake is the pursuit of volumes
But despite the departure of large customers, the main goal for the management of SU-155 remained large volumes of construction, allowing the use of all the assets of the group, recalls a former employee of Balakin. “Revenue went primarily to new sites, we simply could not reduce the pace of construction, because this would mean a chain reaction when all the enterprises of the group would stop one after another,” he explains.
Balakin himself confirmed this: at a press conference in June, he called the main mistake its decision not to reduce construction volumes during the crisis, leaving them at the same level. “I proceeded from the fact that the industry had to be loaded,” said then Balakin . “But taking into account the cash gap, we had to attract quite expensive loans.”
Because of the race for volumes, SU-155 had to work on low margins: in an interview with Kommersant in 2008, Balakin said that the profitability of the group's projects is 7-10%. “For SU-155, working on the minimum margin is a conscious strategy, since the scale required fast turnover and stable financial flow”, explains Sarokvasha.
During the crisis years, the already low margin of the SU-155 decreased again - the group cut prices to boost sales."We couldn't stop and wait" , emphasizes Sarokvasha . The fact that prices for apartments until 2014 grew faster than the cost of construction allowed SU-155, if necessary, to sell objects below market prices, says Sergey, head of the analytics and consulting department at Best-Novostroy. Lobzhanidze.
So, at the average market the price in the Odintsovo district is 60 thousand rubles. for 1 sq. m in 2010, SU-155 could sell apartments in its Novaya Trekhgorka for 42-44 thousand rubles. “Apartments sold quickly and cheaply,” recalls one of former employees sales department SU-155. “As construction progressed, prices rose, so we regulated the dynamics of sales.”
However, the main problems of the SU-155 are still not related to who heads the Moscow or Moscow Region administration, Alexander Khinshtein is sure. He believes that the company's systemic problems played a decisive role.
While the apartments were actively sold, SU-155 could work according to the usual scheme, but when sales of housing in the mass segment fell,source of investment Balakin disappeared,” said State Duma deputy Alexander Khinshtein.
The third mistake is forced creditors
The third mistake was the SU-155's habit of not paying bills on time, as well as delaying the completion of facilities, in fact, taking loans from suppliers, contractors and homebuyers. “Many developers used to do this before,” says a representative of the manufacturer. plastic windows, who collaborated with the SU-155. “But if we sooner or later managed to reach an agreement with the majority, then Balakin’s employees agreed to a constructive dialogue only after the court took our side.”
This behavior of the SU-155 has been known on the market for a long time, but in recent years the company has resorted to such a scheme of work more and more often, says another partner of the group. Thus, at the suit of the GVSU Center, which acted as the contractor for the SU-155 project for the restoration of Tskhinval and did not receive 230 million rubles for this, some accounts of the SU-155 were arrested, but the debt has not yet been repaid.
In base Arbitration Court Moscow contains information about hundreds of lawsuits against SU-155 with monetary claims, of which about 300 were submitted in 2015.
Probably, Balakin allowed himself some risky schemes of work, believing that the authorities would not apply too harsh measures to a company with thousands of shareholders, argues another developer. “The main task is to prevent the appearance of deceived equity holders and prevent unemployment among the company’s employees,” German Yelyanyushkin, head of the construction complex near Moscow, admitted in an interview with RBC in May this year, commenting on the situation with the SU-155. Nevertheless, the dissatisfaction of officials gradually grew.
First of all, the officials were not satisfied with the fact that in fact the only scheme for the operation of the SU-155 was the use of housing construction cooperatives (HCC). The sales scheme through housing cooperatives is legal, but it does not allow the authorities to control the intended use of money, the developer can direct it to the construction of other facilities, Khinshtein explains, one of the initiators of the law on toughening the requirements for housing cooperatives. “At the same time, the developer selling through housing cooperatives, without concluding equity participation agreements, does not have strict obligations to shareholders on the timing of the completion of the house,” he adds.
Large developers gradually agreed to work according to the new rules - by concluding equity participation agreements (DDU) under Law No. 214, and Balakin was in the minority. The former authorities of Moscow and the Moscow region did not strongly oppose the schemes of operation of the SU-155, but everything changed with the arrival of Sergei Sobyanin and Andrei Vorobyov: and The new mayor of the capital, and the new governor of the Moscow region, publicly criticized the SU-155 due to delays in the construction of social housing.
In December 2014 Gosstroynadzor Moscow Region filed an application for bankruptcy of one of the structures of SU-155 - Advanced Technologies in Construction LLC. The company that built the new microdistrict in Dolgoprudny owed about 1 billion rubles to the city budget. and 25 million rubles. - directly Gosstroynadzor.
The microdistrict "Central" in Dolgoprudny SU-155 was built, but did not pay for the land lease. The patience of officials near Moscow ended in November last year, when they demanded the repayment of a debt that by that time had reached almost 1 billion rubles. (Photo: Ekaterina Kuzmina / RBC)
Even if SU-155 manages to solve its problems, it will not happen in one year, and its business will definitely not be the same size, at best, it will be halved, General Director of Infoline-Analytics Mikhail Burmistrov is categorical. But in order to survive, companies need to sell semi-profile assets, rebuild relationships with banks and restore its reputation, he stresses.
The group has already managed to sell a controlling stake in Bogaevsky career”, 57% Oresh kinsky plant of non-metallic building materials and production site inApparently, having gained 1.8 billion rubles for them, he told Balakin at the end of June. According to him, documents on the sale of other assets, including transport companies groups and regional construction sites, estimated at 1.2 billion rubles.
“In a falling market, only a strategically thinking investor can buy assets, confident in the recovery of the market in the medium term and the return of liquidity. And these are not so easy to find today, ”the CEO warns consulting company"Decision" (specializes in the examination of industrial enterprises) Alexander Batushansky. He believes that the SU-155 industrial block today costs no more than 20 billion rubles, given last year's revenue in 36 billion rubles, a discount rate of 10% and coefficients at which public developers are traded, which also have industrial enterprises in their structure.
A large asset of the group can also be considered a land bank: according to Sarokvashi, the company's land allows the construction of about 7 million square meters. m of real estate, where the plots are located, he does not specify. Taking into account construction standards - 20 thousand square meters. m per 1 ha - the land bank can be about 350 ha. If these lands were located in the Moscow region, where about 400 thousand rubles are given for one hundred square meters, about 14 billion rubles could be asked for the entire portfolio, suggested the general director of Geo Development (specializes in land valuation) Maxim Leshchev.
The proceeds from the sale of assets will be used to complete construction projects, the company claims.The problem is that until 2016 the SU-155to build another 300 thousand square meters. m , for which it is necessary to attract 3-5 billion rubles.The SU-155 website contains information that the company currently has 1.65 million sq. m apartments at different stages of construction, non-residential premises and garages.
In parallel, SU-155 is trying to restructure debts. The group's largest creditor is now Rosbank, to which SU-155 owes 3.8 billion rubles. SU-155 assured that negotiations with the bank are in the final stage. Rosbank declined to comment on this. The bankruptcy petition SU-155, which the bank sent to the Moscow Arbitration Court in April, has not yet been withdrawn.
Yet the authorities want to avoid the bankruptcy of the entire SU-155 group. In the event of the collapse of the company, about 18 thousand equity holders may appear in the Moscow region alone, obligations to which have not been fulfilled, Yelyanyushkin told RBC in June. In total, there may be twice as many of them in Russia, Khinshtein estimates.
How is the real estate market doing?
Head of IRN-Consulting Tatyana Kalyuzhnova
“If by the fall of 2009, after the previous crisis, all macroeconomic indicators had already confidently gone up, this time we are seeing, in fact, the development new wave negativity. It is noteworthy that now the focus is not even on the situation around Ukraine, but on oil at $50, the dollar at 70 rubles, the rise in prices for food and other essential goods, as well as the constant shake-ups in world markets. financial markets that do not contribute to the restoration of economic growth.
It is not surprising that this state of affairs does not at all contribute to the growth of solvent demand in real estate. During August, prices for apartments in Moscow showed a complete inability to win back the weakening of the ruble, even partially. If at the end of 2014 the cost per square meter tried to grow after the dollar, at least partially, reaching $3.4 thousand (217 thousand rubles at the rate of 64 rubles per dollar), now, with a significant increase in the exchange rate, ruble prices are hardly balancing on the same level, and in dollar terms are rapidly declining. By the beginning of September, they reached 186.8 thousand rubles, or $2.8 thousand per 1 sq. m. m.
General Director of NDV-Nedvizhimost Alexander Khrustalev
“This year, prices for new buildings almost did not grow, having increased only by 3-5%. At the same time, last year the market average growth was 18%. So far, only new buildings are actively rising in price, depending on the stage of construction - by 15% or more. We are now, in fact, at the bottom. A return to active growth will occur only when the economy resumes growth. In this case, for short term prices will even win back the dollar fall and return to the average level of $5-5.5 thousand per 1 sq. m. m.
Representative of the Morton group Igor Ladychuk
“Demand in the capital's housing market has been very inconsistent this year. At the beginning of the year - in January-February - the number of those wishing to buy apartments fell by 35% at once, mainly due to the cessation of mortgage loans. In March, when the preferential mortgage program was launched, demand began to recover. In April-May, it already exceeded the same level of 2014 by about 20%. In June, it stabilized at about the same level as last year, and in July-August it slightly exceeded the level of last year.
CEO of Tekta Group Dmitry Konovalov
“At the beginning of the year, the demand for real estate fell significantly under the influence of external factors and political events. The depth of subsidence was up to 30%. This was especially noticeable against the backdrop of rush demand in December 2014. By the end of the first quarter, after the launch of the preferential mortgage program, the market began to revive a little.
This summer, compared to the same period last year, we did not notice significant changes in demand. The drawdown in relation to spring indicators was at the average market level of 20%, which is traditionally associated with the holiday period. At the same time, if in July sales were supported by deferred demand and preferential mortgages, by August these reserves were practically exhausted.”
Partner of the development company "Khimki Group" Dmitry Kotrovsky
“In the Moscow region, the decline in real demand for new buildings compared to the summer of 2014 ranged from 20 to 40%, depending on the price class of housing. At the same time, the potential demand in the summer of 2015 (applications that are not yet converted into transactions) turned out to be higher than in the summer of 2014 by 25-30%. This suggests that a new layer of deferred demand has actively begun to form on the market due to people who have not been ready to enter the real estate market over the past 6-9 months, but really need to solve the housing problem, regardless of their level of solvency. These are buyers “for themselves”, not investors.”
update date 22 July 2019TIN 7736003162
The SU-155 Group of Companies has been conducting construction activities since 1954. This year, the organization Stroymontazhtrest No. 3 appeared and began to develop, on the basis of which the SU-155 company will appear in the future. At first, the company was engaged in the construction of inexpensive housing and achieved some success in this field of activity. The company took part in the development of many districts of the capital. Under the leadership of the organization, several large-scale construction projects were carried out in many districts of the capital: in the Novye Cheryomushki microdistrict, Khoroshevo-Mnevniki and in the Sokol district. After some time, the organization began to build monolithic buildings, as well as houses that are already relatively high: from nine to sixteen floors. The company erected such types of houses in Cheryomushki. In addition, active construction was developing in a number of areas: in Novye Kuzminki, Kuntsevo, Zyuzino and others.
In the early 1970s, StroymontazhTrest No. 3 changed its former name to SU-155. Under this name, the company operated until 2015. The organization picked up construction pace and subsequently participated in many major projects. She built almost entire new neighborhoods.
In April 2015, SU-155 was declared bankrupt at the suit of the Bank of Moscow. In December 2015, 145 residential properties of the company's construction in progress were transferred to Russian Capital Bank. Of these, 15 residential complexes are located in the Moscow region. In order to continue the construction and sale of these facilities, the Russian Capital Bank established RK Stroy LLC.
Apartments from developers with promotions
The structure of the company
The company consisted of 84 enterprises.
In 2013, the organization launched the Serpukhov Elevator Plant. The enterprise was included in this industrial association. This also included enterprises for the production of fittings and for the production of metal structures. Presumably, the turnover of all listed enterprises united in one cluster amounted to 25 billion rubles. annually.
The SU-155 Group included the following developers:
- CJSC Construction Management No. 155 (Moscow)
- LLC "Leader" (Moscow)
- CJSC Construction Company RosStroy (St. Petersburg)
- JSC "Ivanovskaya DSK" (Ivanovo)
- CJSC Moscow Regional Investment construction company" (Moscow city)
- CJSC Mosstroyinvest - Kaluga (Kaluga)
- CJSC Tver Investment and Construction Company (Tver)
- ZAO Energotekhprom Invest Stroy (Moscow)
- CJSC Farot (Moscow)
- Nikitskoye LLC (Domodedovo, Konstantinovo settlement)
- Advanced Technologies in Construction LLC (Moscow)
- RosStroy LLC (Kaliningrad)
- StroyKat LLC (Volgograd)
- Eifer LLC (Moscow)
- LLC "Southern Russian Investment and Construction Company" (Tula)
- LLC "Montazhinstroy" Nizhny Novgorod)
- East Siberian Construction Company LLC (Omsk)
Contracting companies:
- branch "MZHS" (Moscow)
- branch "DSK-5" (Moscow)
- branch "FundamentStroy" (Moscow)
- OOO "Inzhstroy-13" (Moscow)
- VIRA DVA LLC (Moscow)
- CJSC "Construction Department No. 155" (Moscow)
- branch "SI-17" (Moscow)
- branch "SU-93" (Moscow)
- branch "SKB-Stroy" (Moscow)
- RIMITE branch (Moscow)
- branch "TEKSVIN" (Moscow)
- EMKA branch (Moscow)
- branch "PSK-7" (Moscow)
- branch "KAISSA" (Moscow)
- branch "Danata-Plus" (Moscow)
- branch "Setmontazh" (Moscow)
- branch "OGE" (Moscow)
- branch "KDS" (Moscow)
- branch "Slavstroy" (Moscow)
- branch "MU-8" (Moscow)
- LLC "Metal-Invest" (Tver)
Machine-building productions:
- LLC "Machine-building plant" (Ivanovo region, Vichuga)
- OJSC "Strommashina" (Ivanovo region, Kokhma)
- Odintsovsky LLC machine building plant» (Moscow region, Odintsovo)
- JSC "Stankoagregat" (Moscow)"
- Serpukhov Lift Building Plant LLC (Moscow Region, Serpukhov)
Production of building materials:
- OOO Domodedovsky ABZ (Moscow region, Domodedovo)
- CJSC "First Cement Company" ( Kaluga region, Kondrovo)
- LLC "First cement company" (Kaluga region, Kondrovo)
- OOO "Bild terminal" (Moscow)
- KSK-Temp LLC (Moscow region, Serpukhov)
- LLC "Oreshkinsky plant of non-metallic building materials" (Moscow region, Ruzsky district, p / o Kolyubakino)
- LLC "DON Quarry" (Lipetsk region, Yelets district, Zadonevsky village)
- CJSC "Kstovsky Plant of Reinforced Concrete Products" ( Nizhny Novgorod Region, Kstovo)
- CJSC "Stroyindustriya" (Moscow region, Odintsovo)
- OJSC "Belostolbovsky brick factory" (Moscow region, Domodedovo, microdistrict Belye Stolby)
- OJSC "Voyskovitsky plant of reinforced concrete products No. 1" (Leningrad region, Gatchinsky district, Voyskovitsy village)
- OJSC Large Parts Plant (Tula)
- CJSC Domodedovo Plant of Reinforced Concrete Products (Moscow Region, Domodedovo)
- OJSC Kalibrovsky Plant (Moscow)
- JSC "Orsk career management" (Orenburg region, Orsk)
- OJSC "Stromremontnaladka" (Moscow region, Odintsovo)
- JSC "Betiar-22" (Moscow)
- LLC "BioLesProm" (Vologda region, Verkhovazhsky district, village of Verkhovazhye)
- Shatovo LLC (Moscow region, Serpukhov district, village of Kalinovo)
- LLC "Torfyanik" / LLC "Ecotorfo" (Moscow region, Lotoshinsky district, village Torfyanoy)
- Andreevsky Quarry LLC (Kaluga)
- OOO "Master" (Moscow region, Lobnya)
Customer companies and designers:
- LLC "Department of Capital Construction of the Construction Department No. 155"
- SpetsStroy LLC (Moscow)
- LLC "Design Institute" DSK-Proekt "(Ivanovo)
- CJSC "Ivanovo Design Institute for Urban Planning Industry and Surveys No. 6" (Ivanovo)
Commercial companies:
- Limited partnership "SU-№155 AND COMPANY" (Moscow)
- CJSC "Company MONBLAN" (Moscow)
Management companies:
- Zhilstroy LLC (Tula)
- OOO UK Upravdom (Moscow)
- LLC "UK Pavshino" (Moscow region, Krasnogorsk)
- LLC "EDS - Serpukhov" (Moscow region, Serpukhov)
- CJSC "Ivanovskaya thermal block-station" (Ivanovo)
- OOO " Management Company"PARKING-155" (Moscow)
Transport companies:
- OOO Helicopter Company MKL (Moscow)
- Branch "MIAT" (Moscow)
Financial sector:
- OOO SU-155 Capital
GK "SU-155" is a company with more than half a century of history, founded in 1954. My recent history the company has been writing since 1993, when CJSC "SU-155" was established, and since 2014 the company began to work in the format joint-stock company. The developer is an enterprise of federal importance, which plays a significant role in the implementation of government construction programs. The company has recently experienced financial difficulties. The state is supporting the completion of SU-155 facilities in 14 regions of the country.
In most regions of the country, the SU-155 Group of Companies is considered the mayor responsible for the construction of large residential microdistricts, the creation and development of infrastructure, and the reconstruction of communications that ensure the normal functioning of the city. The main field of activity is construction, development, mechanical engineering, this is an enterprise with a closed production cycle.
